Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:44:37 -0700 | From | Greg KH <> | Subject | Re: [RFC Aufs2 #3 2/2] split 'xino' entry under sysfs |
| |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 02:15:49PM +0900, hooanon05@yahoo.co.jp wrote: > > Greg KH: > > Looks like a good start, if you are _sure_ you need sysfs files :) > > I believe those paths are important to users. > When CONFIG_SYSFS is disabled, they are printed in /proc/mounts (and has > severer limit).
No one disables sysfs that I know of. Heck, my phone enables sysfs...
> Addition to set limit, there is one more reason to adopt seq_file. > Because the printed string is a path, it may contain unprintable > characters. seq_file has a good interface seq_path() which supports > escaping such characters.
That is true. Ok, let's see the final result and I'll be glad to look at it.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |