lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Question about x86/mm/gup.c's use of disabled interrupts
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:31:55AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Nick Piggin wrote:
>>> Also, assuming that disabling the interrupt is enough to get the
>>> guarantees we need here, there's a Xen problem because we don't use IPIs
>>> for cross-cpu tlb flushes (well, it happens within Xen). I'll have to
>>> think a bit about how to deal with that, but I'm thinking that we could
>>> add a per-cpu "tlb flushes blocked" flag, and maintain some kind of
>>> per-cpu deferred tlb flush count so we can get around to doing the flush
>>> eventually.
>>>
>>> But I want to make sure I understand the exact algorithm here.
>>
>> FWIW, powerpc actually can flush tlbs without IPIs, and it also has
>> a gup_fast. powerpc RCU frees its page _tables_ so we can walk them,
>> and then I use speculative page references in order to be able to
>> take a reference on the page without having it pinned.
>
> Ah, interesting. So disabling interrupts prevents the RCU free from
> happening, and non-atomic pte fetching is a non-issue. So it doesn't
> address the PAE side of the problem.

This would be rcu_sched, correct?

Thanx, Paul

>> Turning gup_get_pte into a pvop would be a bit nasty because on !PAE
>> it is just a single load, and even on PAE it is pretty cheap.
>>
>
> Well, it wouldn't be too bad; for !PAE it would turn into something we
> could inline, so there'd be little to no cost. For PAE it would be out of
> line, but a direct function call, which would be nicely cached and very
> predictable once we've gone through the the loop once (and for Xen I think
> I'd just make it a cmpxchg8b-based implementation, assuming that the tlb
> flush hypercall would offset the cost of making gup_fast a bit slower).
>
> But it would be better if we can address it at a higher level.
>
> J
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-20 06:11    [W:0.079 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site