Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 02 Mar 2009 11:23:13 -0800 | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86: make text_poke() atomic |
| |
Masami Hiramatsu wrote: >>> >>> Stop machine is not required when inserting a breakpoint. >> >> that is your assumption; when I spoke with CPU architects they >> cringed ;( > > Is that true even if modifying just one-byte (like int3 insertion) > and we don't care synchronous write(that means code modification > effects on other processors after a while)? >
The problem is that he's using is as part of a sequenced series of steps. The lack of synchronization comes into play there.
-hpa
|  |