lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing)

* Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:26:21 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> >
> > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 09:17 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > [adding cc:s]
> > >
> > > [same report for March 12]
> > >
> > > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > > Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >> Hi all,
> > > >>
> > > >> Changes since 20090310:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Building on i386 generates a ton of printk format warnings:
> > > >
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 9 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 10 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 13 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 14 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 17 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 18 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 21 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 22 has type 'unsigned int'
> > > >
> >
> > I believe this is corrected in Ingo's tip tree. I changed %lu to %zu to
> > handle the "sizeof()" case. The fix was suggested by Andrew Morton.
>
>
> This build warning is still around (20090318).
> Is the fix not in some branch that is imported into linux-next or what?

be patient.

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-18 17:09    [W:0.065 / U:0.284 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site