Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:06:21 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for March 11 (tracing) |
| |
* Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:26:21 -0400 Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 09:17 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > [adding cc:s] > > > > > > [same report for March 12] > > > > > > Randy Dunlap wrote: > > > > Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > > > >> > > > >> Changes since 20090310: > > > > > > > > > > > > Building on i386 generates a ton of printk format warnings: > > > > > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 9 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 10 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 13 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 14 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 17 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 18 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 21 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > kernel/trace/trace_events.c:470: warning: format '%lu' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 22 has type 'unsigned int' > > > > > > > > I believe this is corrected in Ingo's tip tree. I changed %lu to %zu to > > handle the "sizeof()" case. The fix was suggested by Andrew Morton. > > > This build warning is still around (20090318). > Is the fix not in some branch that is imported into linux-next or what?
be patient.
Ingo
| |