lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [v3 PATCH 2/4] timers: Identifying the existing pinned timers
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Arun R Bharadwaj wrote:
> * Arun R Bharadwaj <arun@linux.vnet.ibm.com> [2009-03-16 16:40:45]:
>
> The following pinned hrtimers have been identified and marked:
> 1)sched_rt_period_timer
> 2)tick_sched_timer
> 3)stack_trace_timer_fn

How did you verify that these are the only timers which need to be
pinned ?

Can we be sure that there is no code which relies on the current
behaviour to keep functionality tied together ? Networking and block
layer comes to mind.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-17 14:11    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans