Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/4] softirq: no need to have SOFTIRQ in softirq name | From | Jaswinder Singh Rajput <> | Date | Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:10:11 +0530 |
| |
On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 01:04 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > plain text document attachment > (0004-softirq-no-need-to-have-SOFTIRQ-in-softirq-name.patch) > From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> > > Impact: clean up > > It is redundant to have 'SOFTIRQ' in the softirq names. > > Reported-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com> > --- > kernel/softirq.c | 5 ++--- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c > index a5e8123..65ff3e3 100644 > --- a/kernel/softirq.c > +++ b/kernel/softirq.c > @@ -55,9 +55,8 @@ static struct softirq_action softirq_vec[NR_SOFTIRQS] __cacheline_aligned_in_smp > static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd); > > char *softirq_to_name[NR_SOFTIRQS] = { > - "HI_SOFTIRQ", "TIMER_SOFTIRQ", "NET_TX_SOFTIRQ", "NET_RX_SOFTIRQ", > - "BLOCK_SOFTIRQ", "TASKLET_SOFTIRQ", "SCHED_SOFTIRQ", "HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ", > - "RCU_SOFTIRQ" > + "HI", "TIMER", "NET_TX", "NET_RX", "BLOCK", > + "TASKLET", "SCHED", "HRTIMER", "RCU" > }; >
This will look more better:
+ "HI", "TIMER", "NET_TX", + "NET_RX", "BLOCK", "TASKLET", + "SCHED", "HRTIMER", "RCU"
-- JSR
| |