Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:56:46 +0530 | From | Balbir Singh <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4 |
| |
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-12 14:32:12]:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:34:23 +0530 > Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > > > Not yet.. you just posted it. I am testing my v5, which I'll post > > soon. I am seeing very good results with v5. I'll test yours later > > today. > > > > If "hooks" to usual path doesn't exist and there are no global locks, > I don't have much concern with your version.
Good to know. I think it is always good to have competing patches and then collaborating and getting the best in.
> But 'sorting' seems to be overkill to me. >
Sorting is very useful, specially if you have many cgroups. Without sorting, how do we select what group to select first.
> I'm sorry if my responce to your patch is delayed. I may not be in office. >
No problem
-- Balbir
| |