lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-12 14:32:12]:

> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:34:23 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Not yet.. you just posted it. I am testing my v5, which I'll post
> > soon. I am seeing very good results with v5. I'll test yours later
> > today.
> >
>
> If "hooks" to usual path doesn't exist and there are no global locks,
> I don't have much concern with your version.

Good to know. I think it is always good to have competing patches and
then collaborating and getting the best in.

> But 'sorting' seems to be overkill to me.
>

Sorting is very useful, specially if you have many cgroups. Without
sorting, how do we select what group to select first.

> I'm sorry if my responce to your patch is delayed. I may not be in office.
>

No problem

--
Balbir


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-12 09:29    [W:0.228 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site