Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:39:49 +0900 | From | KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4 |
| |
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:16:47 +0530 Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-12 09:52:47]: > I've tested so far by > > Creating two cgroups and then > > a. Assigning limits of 1G and 2G and run memory allocation and touch > test softlimit ?
> b. Same as (a) with 1G and 1G > c. Same as (a) with 0 and 1G > d. Same as (a) with 0 and 0 > > More comments in induvidual patches. > Then, 1. what's the number of active threads ? 2. what's the number of cpus ? 3. what's the numa configuration, if numa ? 4. what's the zone configuration ? 5. what's arch ? 6. what's amount of total memory ? 7. Do you find difference in behavior with and without softlimit ? 8. Do you tested *this* version ?
Thanks, -Kame
> -- > Balbir >
| |