lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] track files for checkpointability
>> And if Ingo's requirement is fulfilled, would any C/R patchset be acceptable ?
>
> Yup, no matter how hideous :) Ok not really.
>
> But the point was that it wasn't Dave not understanding Alexey's
> suggestion, but Greg not understanding Ingo's. If you think Ingo's
> goal isn't worthwhile or achievable, then argue that (as I am), don't
> keep elaborating on something we all agree will be needed (Alexey's
> suggestion or some other way of doing a true may-be-checkpointed test).

I rather spend my time on enabling things rather than forbid them.

C.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-03-11 08:55    [W:0.117 / U:0.528 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site