Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:51:45 +0100 | From | Cedric Le Goater <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/11] track files for checkpointability |
| |
>> And if Ingo's requirement is fulfilled, would any C/R patchset be acceptable ? > > Yup, no matter how hideous :) Ok not really. > > But the point was that it wasn't Dave not understanding Alexey's > suggestion, but Greg not understanding Ingo's. If you think Ingo's > goal isn't worthwhile or achievable, then argue that (as I am), don't > keep elaborating on something we all agree will be needed (Alexey's > suggestion or some other way of doing a true may-be-checkpointed test).
I rather spend my time on enabling things rather than forbid them.
C.
| |