Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Mar 2009 22:27:10 +0800 | From | Américo Wang <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] UML on UML fixed: it did not start |
| |
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 08:49:22PM +0100, Renzo Davoli wrote: >It is currently impossible to run a user-mode linux machine inside another user-mode >linux (UML on UML). It breaks after a few instructions. When it tries to check >whether SYSEMU is installed (the inner) UML receives an inconsistent result >(from the outer UML). > >This is the output of a broken attempt: >$ ./linux mem=256m ubd0=cow >Locating the bottom of the address space ... 0x0 >Locating the top of the address space ... 0xc0000000 >Core dump limits : > soft - 0 > hard - NONE >Checking that ptrace can change system call numbers...OK >Checking ptrace new tags for syscall emulation...unsupported >Checking syscall emulation patch for ptrace...check_sysemu : expected SIGTRAP, got status = 256 >$ > >The problem is the following: >PTRACE_SYSCALL/SINGLESTEP is currently managed inside arch_ptrace for ARCH=um. > >PTRACE_SYSEMU/SUSEMU_SINGLESTEP is not captured in arch_ptrace's switch, therefore >it is erroneously passed back to ptrace_request (in kernel/ptrace). > >This simple patch simply forces ptrace to return an error on PTRACE_SYSEMU/SUSEMU_SINGLESTEP >as it is unsupported on ARCH=um, and fixes the problem. > >I posted the same patch one month ago. I just tested it again against the latest kernel. > > renzo > >Signed-off-by: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew, would you like to put this patch into -mm? It looks fine for me.
Renzo, I remember you sent some patches about PTRACE_SYSEMU support for UML some days ago, could you please rebase them against the latest -git tree and resend?
Thank you very much! Have a nice day!
Yours, Cong
| |