Messages in this thread | | | From | Roland McGrath <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole | Date | Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:44:23 -0800 (PST) |
| |
> And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially a > 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ seccomp. It > does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but it might not be > used anywhere.
I have no idea who uses it. I just assume that anyone who is using it might be expecting it to be reliable for security purposes as advertised.
Thanks, Roland
| |