Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 1 Mar 2009 12:58:49 -0800 | From | Gary Hade <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: get_nid_for_pfn() returns int |
| |
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:08:05PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:02:00 -0800 Gary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com> wrote: > > > > > > Should it unlinger? I have it in the 2.6.30 pile. > > > > > > > > Yes, that would be good. :) > > > > > > What would be good? Your answer is ambiguous. > > > > Sorry, I was just trying to agree that your plan to wait > > until 2.6.30 works for me. Unless someone else objects > > leave it in your 2.6.30 pile. > > I object ;) > > The change is obviously correct, let's merge it now.
Well, I wouldn't quibble with that. :) Thanks!
> > This could cause presently-working systems to stop working due to > hitherto-undiscovered bugs. If so, sue me.
Extremely unlikely IMO.
Gary
-- Gary Hade System x Enablement IBM Linux Technology Center 503-578-4503 IBM T/L: 775-4503 garyhade@us.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc
| |