lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: cpufreq: last commit for 2.6.29 break cpufreq performance module
From
Sorry about the wrong info, i used the last cpufreq_ondemand.c file
before this commit and get the same problem. So it' s not the last
commit that changes the behaviour.
I'll bisect it and give more info.

On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Guilherme Malschitzky Schroeder
<guilherme.m.schroeder@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After this commit 6707fbb56c8fd3121e334291d170934bcaca2e7f, if i
> change the governor of cpufreq to performance, my processor still
> shows 800MHz instead of 2268.
>
> dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat scaling_governor
> ondemand
>
> dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat cpuinfo_cur_freq
> 800000
>
> dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# echo performance > scaling_governor
> dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat scaling_governor
> performance
> dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat cpuinfo_cur_freq
> 2267000
>
> But, /proc/cpuinfo shows 800MHz:
>
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.26GHz
> stepping : 6
> cpu MHz : 800.000
>
> And i cannot remove the ondemand module:
>
> dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# rmmod cpufreq_ondemand
> ERROR: Module cpufreq_ondemand is in use
>
> I can confirm that it's not on 2268MHz because glxgears runs below the expected.
>
> No errors on dmesg too.
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-10 02:43    [W:0.053 / U:0.692 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site