Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Feb 2009 23:41:08 -0200 | Subject | Re: cpufreq: last commit for 2.6.29 break cpufreq performance module | From | Guilherme Malschitzky Schroeder <> |
| |
Sorry about the wrong info, i used the last cpufreq_ondemand.c file before this commit and get the same problem. So it' s not the last commit that changes the behaviour. I'll bisect it and give more info.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 11:21 PM, Guilherme Malschitzky Schroeder <guilherme.m.schroeder@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > After this commit 6707fbb56c8fd3121e334291d170934bcaca2e7f, if i > change the governor of cpufreq to performance, my processor still > shows 800MHz instead of 2268. > > dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat scaling_governor > ondemand > > dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat cpuinfo_cur_freq > 800000 > > dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# echo performance > scaling_governor > dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat scaling_governor > performance > dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# cat cpuinfo_cur_freq > 2267000 > > But, /proc/cpuinfo shows 800MHz: > > model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.26GHz > stepping : 6 > cpu MHz : 800.000 > > And i cannot remove the ondemand module: > > dub:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq# rmmod cpufreq_ondemand > ERROR: Module cpufreq_ondemand is in use > > I can confirm that it's not on 2268MHz because glxgears runs below the expected. > > No errors on dmesg too. >
| |