lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [cgroup or VFS ?] WARNING: at fs/namespace.c:636 mntput_no_expire+0xac/0xf2()
Al Viro wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 12:40:46AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> Thread 1:
>>> for ((; ;))
>>> {
>>> mount -t cgroup -o cpuset xxx /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>> mkdir /mnt/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
>>> rmdir /mnt/0 > /dev/null 2>&1
>>> umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>> }
>>>
>>> Thread 2:
>>> {
>>> mount -t cpuset xxx /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>> umount /mnt > /dev/null 2>&1
>>> }
>
> How cute... Same mountpoint in both, so these mount(2) will sometimes
> fail (cgroup picks the same sb on the same options, AFAICS) and fail
> silently due to these redirects...
>
> That's a lovely way to stress-test a large part of ro-bind stuff *and*
> umount()-related code. Could you do C equivalent of the above (just
> the same syscalls in loop, nothing fancier) and do time-stamped strace?
>

Sure, I'll write a C version and try to reproduce the warning.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-09 12:33    [W:0.120 / U:0.796 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site