Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:51:49 +0000 | From | Ralf Baechle <> | Subject | Re: x86: spinlocks: define dummy __raw_spin_is_contended |
| |
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 01:03:41PM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com> > > Architectures other than mips and x86 are not using ticket > spinlocks. Therefore, the contention on the lock is meaningless, > since there is nobody known to be waiting on it (arguably /fairly/ > unfair locks) Dummy it out to return 0 on other architectures. > > Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <kyle@redhat.com>
Looks good.
Acked-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Ralf
| |