Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] work_on_cpu: Use our own workqueue. | Date | Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:11:35 +1030 |
| |
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 13:31:11 Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 13:14:31 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > > I think you're right though: smp_call_function_single (or neat wrappers) > > where possible, work_on_cpu which can fail for the others, and we'll just > > have to plumb in the error returns. > > I bet a lot of those can use plain old schedule_work_on().
Which is where work_on_cpu started: a little wrapper around schedule_work_on.
We're going in circles, no? Rusty.
| |