lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: cgroup mount point
    On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 11:44:00PM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
    > "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> writes:
    >
    > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 07:41:53PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
    > > > So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers,
    > > > /dev/cpuset, /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset.
    > >
    > > Putting new mount points in / is not really acceptable, so that rules
    > > out the first two. /opt is just totally wrong, since that is intended
    > > for add on software packages. /dev/ feels a little odd, since it is
    > > not really device nodes
    >
    > I agree with all that Thadeu Lima says here. I would add that cgroups
    > are nothing to do with device nodes, so definitely don't belong in
    > ‘/dev/’ either.

    The message you quoted is from Daniel Berrange, not me. Could you also
    tell your rationale for not agreeing with /?

    Regards,
    Cascardo.

    > Since they're a filesystem mapping “for browsing and manipulation
    > from user space” of a kernel facility, I think ‘/sys/cgroups/’ is
    > appropriate.
    >
    > --
    > \ “It's my belief we developed language because of our deep inner |
    > `\ need to complain.” —Jane Wagner, via Lily Tomlin |
    > _o__) |
    > Ben Finney
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-02-03 13:59    [W:4.145 / U:0.464 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site