lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole
Date
> btw., shouldnt is_compat_task() expand to 0 in the 
> !CONFIG_COMPAT case? That way we could remove this #ifdef too.
> (and move the first #ifdef inside the array initialization so
> that we always have a mode1_syscalls_32[] array.)

I guess you mean define it in linux/compat.h then?
Go right ahead. Whatever you want is fine by me.


Thanks,
Roland


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-28 08:39    [W:0.087 / U:12.016 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site