Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:54:33 -0800 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] x86-64: seccomp: fix 32/64 syscall hole |
| |
On Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:46:01 -0800 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 09:23:36AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > But here is the patch you asked for. > > > > Yes, this looks much more straightforward. > > > > And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially > > a 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ > > seccomp. It does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but > > it might not be used anywhere. > > It's enabled in SuSE kernels. >
but are there users of it? I thought Andrea stopped the cpushare thing that was the only user of this....
-- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org
| |