Messages in this thread |  | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | | Subject | Re: [Bug #12210] 2.6.28-rc8 big regression in VM | | Date | Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:37:05 +0900 (JST) |
| |
Hi,
> Hello, > > you may remember that I reported regression in VM. I used you filecache module > and discovered that the leaks are caused by these items: > # filecache 1.0 > # ino size cached cached% refcnt state dev file > 167302 16 16 100 1 d- 00:08(tmpfs) /drm\040mm\040object\040(deleted) > 167301 16 16 100 1 d- 00:08(tmpfs) /drm\040mm\040object\040(deleted) > 167300 16 16 100 1 d- 00:08(tmpfs) /drm\040mm\040object\040(deleted) > 167299 4 4 100 1 -- 00:08(tmpfs) /drm\040mm\040object\040(deleted) > 167290 8 8 100 1 -- 00:08(tmpfs) /drm\040mm\040object\040(deleted) > 167289 8 8 100 1 -- 00:08(tmpfs) /drm\040mm\040object\040(deleted) > 167288 16 16 100 1 -- 00:08(tmpfs) /drm\040mm\040object\040(deleted) > 167287 16 16 100 1 d- 00:08(tmpfs) /drm\040mm\040object\040(deleted) > > there are tons of those items: > cat /proc/filecache | grep drm | wc -l > 14224 > > Do you have any clues what happens here? Is it a bug in kernel VM system or it > is more likely a bug in Intel's GEM drm driver? Right now it results in 500MB > of undropable cache. > > Also lsof reports many leaked file descriptors: > lsof | grep drm | wc -l > 7326
lsof output indicate any process don't close this files. I would like to hear drm driver developer's opinion. if many mapped file is unclosed, it seems misdesigned memory wasting.
|  |