Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:10:39 -0300 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] new irq tracer | From | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <> |
| |
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 5:13 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-02-27 at 16:48 +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >> > I mean make the patch of mathieu's plan and mesure it. Then >> > we can mesure number by number. my number mean, >> > >> > (1) How much increasing line and messiness >> > (2) How much improving latency >> > >> > that's fairly comparision and typical lkml discussion style, imho. >> > >> > What do you think? >> >> Patches are welcome ;-) > > Why sad face? Am I talking about funny thing?
Nope, its just that the way you're talking is looking too managerial.
IOW, instead of proposing measurements, do them and show the results, how does that sound?
And ;-) is not a sad face in my dictionary, but an ironic one :-)
- Arnaldo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |