Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:12:55 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] timers: framework for migration between CPU |
| |
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Yes - but that kind of policy should be coupled and expressed > > via cpusets. /proc based irq_affinity is just a limited, > > inflexible hack. All things IRQ partitioning should be handled > > via cpusets - perhaps via the 'system sets' idea from Peter? > > all we got out of that idea was the default_smp_affinity thing > in /proc/irq and a head-ache trying to work out silly details. > > Maybe we ought to try again,..
Your system sets patch was actually very sane, it just fell victim to a merge window i think. Mind re-sending it?
Ingo
| |