lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/4] timers: framework for migration between CPU

* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> wrote:

> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 16:45 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Yes - but that kind of policy should be coupled and expressed
> > via cpusets. /proc based irq_affinity is just a limited,
> > inflexible hack. All things IRQ partitioning should be handled
> > via cpusets - perhaps via the 'system sets' idea from Peter?
>
> all we got out of that idea was the default_smp_affinity thing
> in /proc/irq and a head-ache trying to work out silly details.
>
> Maybe we ought to try again,..

Your system sets patch was actually very sane, it just fell
victim to a merge window i think. Mind re-sending it?

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-26 17:17    [W:0.048 / U:1.276 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site