Messages in this thread | | | From | hooanon05@yahoo ... | Subject | Re: New filesystem for Linux kernel | Date | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 13:09:29 +0900 |
| |
Miklos Szeredi: > I'd personally be more motivated to review <2000 line chunks (where > each step adds new functionality and makes sense in itself), than a > 20000 line filesystem all in one.
That is reasonable. :-)
> Perhaps it's easier, but copy-up is a very inefficient operation, both > in disk space and in time. My personal opinion is that a "delta"
I have to agree again.
> But that's just a thought, I haven't gone too deeply into this. > > > If you say "just a part of write" goes to a new fs, then I don't think > > we can support several essential features, for instance mmap. > > It should be possible to support mmap.
In a easy way? I know you already wrote it is just a thought, but if you have an idea to support mmapping a file which is distributed multiple filesystems, please let me know.
J. R. Okajima
| |