lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC] introduce pr_cont macro
From
Date
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 04:03 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > We cover all log-levels by pr_... macros except
> > KERN_CONT one. Add it for convenience.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> > ---
> >
> > I think start printing with some pr_... macro
> > and continue with printk(KERN_CONT ...) look
> > not that clear -- better to continue with
> > same pr_... slogan. Thoughts? I hope I didn't
> > miss anything.
> >
> > include/linux/kernel.h | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6.git/include/linux/kernel.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/include/linux/kernel.h
> > +++ linux-2.6.git/include/linux/kernel.h
> > @@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ static inline char *pack_hex_byte(char *
> > printk(KERN_NOTICE pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > #define pr_info(fmt, ...) \
> > printk(KERN_INFO pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> > +#define pr_cont(fmt, ...) \
> > + printk(KERN_CONT pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> Makes sense.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>

Don't you want to omit the pr_fmt() from the KERN_CONT case?

Harvey



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-26 04:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans