Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 14/15] bitops: Change the bitmap index from int to unsigned long [frv] | Date | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:37:48 +0000 |
| |
H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> > But how does it break down between "static inline type\nfunction_name" and > > "static inline\ntype function_name"? That's more to the point. > > > > I believe that is the breakdown is roughly what you see above, i.e. over 8:1; > the pattern I used was looking for "^static inline[^;(]*$", and a visual > examination of the results shows that even if my line count is slighly off the > lopsidedness is still dramatic.
Sorry, I meant:
"static inline type\nfunction_name" vs "static inline type function_name"
David
| |