Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:39:20 +0100 (CET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: [patch 5/7] make netfilter use strict integer types |
| |
On Thursday 2009-02-26 01:14, H. Peter Anvin wrote: >>[...] >> IMHO, __uXX should be replaced by uintX_t, but a move this great I >> will leave to future generations because there is just too much >> persisting opinions wrt. such proposal. As such I'd like to join >> and persist on my position and that uintX that we have should be kept. > > We *CAN'T* replace __uXX with uintX_t. Period, full stop, end of story.
Would the mindful master please elaborate why this is so, if it is indeed not a personal decision.
| |