lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: RT scheduling and a way to make a process hang, unkillable
From
Date
On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 17:15 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:15:39PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 15:45 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> >
> > > sched: Don't allow setuid to succeed if the user does not have rt bandwidth
> > >
> > > Corey Hickey reported that on using setuid to change the uid of a
> > > rt process, the process would be unkillable and not be running.
> > > This is because there was no rt runtime for that user group. Add
> > > in a check to see if a user can attach an rt task to its task group.
> >
> > This looks good to me.
> >
> > Does anybody object to the -ENOSPC return value? Should we introduce
> > -ENOTIME for that?
> >
> > Michael, Alan?
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Any comments on which return value to return? Should we introduce
> -ENOTIME?
>
> Corey mentioned he found ENOSPC confusing.

I'd say go for the ENOTIME thing.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-23 13:03    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans