Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 22 Feb 2009 17:34:46 -0800 | From | Jeff Layton <> | Subject | Re: [linux-cifs-client] Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync |
| |
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:12:11 +0100 (CET) Horst Reiterer <horst.reiterer@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Steve French wrote: > > Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option? How about > > "nostrictfsync" ? > > Sound good, should be self-explanatory for Samba users and those familiar > with the fsync concept. > > Horst.
My suggestion would be to not add a new option until someone requests it/complains about it. We already have a lot of unneeded/unused mount options, and I think this will just be adding one to the pile.
My $.02...
-- Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
| |