lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-cifs-client] Re: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 22:12:11 +0100 (CET)
Horst Reiterer <horst.reiterer@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Steve French wrote:
> > Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option? How about
> > "nostrictfsync" ?
>
> Sound good, should be self-explanatory for Samba users and those familiar
> with the fsync concept.
>
> Horst.

My suggestion would be to not add a new option until someone requests
it/complains about it. We already have a lot of unneeded/unused mount
options, and I think this will just be adding one to the pile.

My $.02...

--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-23 02:37    [W:0.070 / U:0.236 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site