[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Horst Reiterer
<> wrote:
> In any case, it's probably a good idea to introduce a mount option. The
> new behavior should be enabled by default though, to provide maximum data
> consistency.

Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option? How about
"nostrictfsync" ?



 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-22 22:07    [W:0.069 / U:3.500 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site