[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] fs/cifs: send SMB_COM_FLUSH in cifs_fsync
    On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Horst Reiterer
    <> wrote:
    > In any case, it's probably a good idea to introduce a mount option. The
    > new behavior should be enabled by default though, to provide maximum data
    > consistency.

    Suggestions on what to call such a new mount option? How about
    "nostrictfsync" ?



     \ /
      Last update: 2009-02-22 22:07    [W:0.020 / U:0.564 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site