[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:29:52PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:

> In fact, we've noticed severe regressions with p4-clockmod over simply
> having no scaling driver at all - and are not going to built it into our
> kernels.

It makes sense to have p4-clockmod from a thermal management
perspective. We should probably bump its transition latency to more than
10ms to prevent ondemand binding to it.

Matthew Garrett |

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-20 18:41    [W:0.101 / U:4.916 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site