[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules
    On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:29:52PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:

    > In fact, we've noticed severe regressions with p4-clockmod over simply
    > having no scaling driver at all - and are not going to built it into our
    > kernels.

    It makes sense to have p4-clockmod from a thermal management
    perspective. We should probably bump its transition latency to more than
    10ms to prevent ondemand binding to it.

    Matthew Garrett |

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-02-20 18:41    [W:0.020 / U:5.776 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site