Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:36:37 +0000 | From | Matthew Garrett <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Change link order of x86 cpufreq modules |
| |
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 05:29:52PM +0000, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> In fact, we've noticed severe regressions with p4-clockmod over simply > having no scaling driver at all - and are not going to built it into our > kernels.
It makes sense to have p4-clockmod from a thermal management perspective. We should probably bump its transition latency to more than 10ms to prevent ondemand binding to it.
-- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org
| |