Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:54:58 -0600 | From | "Chris Friesen" <> | Subject | Re: cgroup mount point |
| |
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> Linux Documentation is not consistent and have some funny options. In > Documentation/cgroups/*, we have:
> So, we have some more options now: /cgroups, /containers, /dev/cpuset, > /dev/cpuctl, /opt/cgroup, /opt/cpuset. > > I am copying the container and the kernel guys. Perhaps, we can find an > agreement (if we want to find one at all) and change all that > Documentation to get consistent.
I'd vote for "cgroups" or "containers", mounted at / or /sys/.
/opt feels more like where software should live, and /dev should be for devices rather than capabilities/management. "cpuctl" and "cpuset" are subsets of the full capabilities of cgroups, so they're suboptimal as far as naming.
Chris
| |