[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 21:17 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Well, harsh or not is not the question here.
> Fact is that you call gettimeofday() _before_ the timekeeping code has
> resumed.
> That's a simple ordering problem. timekeeping is in the sysdev class
> as well and it's not the only sysdev which has explicit ordering
> requirements.

And how do I control that ordering ?

I find that a bit fishy ... What about making gettimeofday() in the
timekeeping code work, just return a frozen snapshot of the value on
suspend instead ?


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-19 22:55    [W:0.117 / U:0.476 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site