[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [Bug #12667] Badness at kernel/time/timekeeping.c:98 in pmud (timekeeping_suspended)
    On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 21:17 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
    > Well, harsh or not is not the question here.
    > Fact is that you call gettimeofday() _before_ the timekeeping code has
    > resumed.
    > That's a simple ordering problem. timekeeping is in the sysdev class
    > as well and it's not the only sysdev which has explicit ordering
    > requirements.

    And how do I control that ordering ?

    I find that a bit fishy ... What about making gettimeofday() in the
    timekeeping code work, just return a frozen snapshot of the value on
    suspend instead ?


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-02-19 22:55    [W:0.019 / U:1.216 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site