[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFD] Automatic suspend
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 11:23:30PM +0000, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:19:38AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This, again, seems to be a bit x86-centric. :-) The Android people are telling
> > us that on the hardware they deal with it does make sense to put the entire
> > system to sleep even for relatively short periods of time, since the latencies
> > involved are not too bad.
> Arve said that the power state was equivalent in idle and suspend, but
> that they preferred suspend because it stopped any periodic timers. I'd
> be more interested in making sure that unnecessary timers aren't running
> than focusing on automatically entering system-wide suspend - Nokia have
> been managing this since 2005 with good results.

I think they where talking timers as hardware devices pulling electrons,
not SW timers triggering wake ups. I guess the timer hardware could be
running, and pulling power, even when not programmed to trigger any
event or IRQ.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-18 12:23    [W:0.255 / U:1.852 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site