lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3)
From
Hi, Greg
Would you mind queuing this patch into your tree?
Thanks!

2009/2/6 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 05:08:58PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:08:51 -0800
>> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:52:24AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:35 +0800
>> > > tom.leiming@gmail.com wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
>> > > >
>> > > > This patch adds a function : driver_wait_probe_done,
>> > > > which waits on condition of probing done to replace
>> > > > polling for driver_probe_done in fs initialization.
>> > > >
>> > > > There is no better way to avoid polling for
>> > > > driver_probe_done _and_ existence of the root device,
>> > > > so we does not replace the driver_probe_done with
>> > > > driver_wait_probe_done in such special case.
>> > > >
>> > > > Removing polling in fs initialization may lead to
>> > > > a faster boot.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
>> > >
>> > > ok this one will work fine ;)
>> > >
>> > > Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
>> > >
>> > > thanks for fixing this up
>> > > (it will clash with the patch that moves this to one place, but the
>> > > same cleanup can be done there)
>> >
>> > What patch is that? Should i be taking this? Or are they in some
>> > other tree?
>>
>> it's the suspend-resume regression fixes that either you already have
>> or that raphael sent to you
>
> Hm, ok, I don't see any left in my tree, or queue, so perhaps someone
> might want to resend them to me?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>



--
Lei Ming


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-18 12:23    [W:0.057 / U:0.636 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site