Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:14:34 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] driver core: remove polling for driver_probe_done(v3) | From | Ming Lei <> |
| |
Hi, Greg Would you mind queuing this patch into your tree? Thanks!
2009/2/6 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 05:08:58PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Feb 2009 15:08:51 -0800 >> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 06:52:24AM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> > > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:48:35 +0800 >> > > tom.leiming@gmail.com wrote: >> > > >> > > > From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> >> > > > >> > > > This patch adds a function : driver_wait_probe_done, >> > > > which waits on condition of probing done to replace >> > > > polling for driver_probe_done in fs initialization. >> > > > >> > > > There is no better way to avoid polling for >> > > > driver_probe_done _and_ existence of the root device, >> > > > so we does not replace the driver_probe_done with >> > > > driver_wait_probe_done in such special case. >> > > > >> > > > Removing polling in fs initialization may lead to >> > > > a faster boot. >> > > > >> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> >> > > >> > > ok this one will work fine ;) >> > > >> > > Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> >> > > >> > > thanks for fixing this up >> > > (it will clash with the patch that moves this to one place, but the >> > > same cleanup can be done there) >> > >> > What patch is that? Should i be taking this? Or are they in some >> > other tree? >> >> it's the suspend-resume regression fixes that either you already have >> or that raphael sent to you > > Hm, ok, I don't see any left in my tree, or queue, so perhaps someone > might want to resend them to me? > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
-- Lei Ming
| |