Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:43:10 +0200 | From | Pekka Enberg <> | Subject | Re: [patch] SLQB slab allocator (try 2) |
| |
Mel Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:17:58PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> Hi Mel, >> >> Mel Gorman wrote: >>> I haven't done much digging in here yet. Between the large page bug and >>> other patches in my inbox, I haven't had the chance yet but that doesn't >>> stop anyone else taking a look. >> So how big does an improvement/regression have to be not to be >> considered within noise? I mean, I randomly picked one of the results >> ("x86-64 speccpu integer tests") and ran it through my "summarize" >> script and got the following results: >> >> min max mean std_dev >> slub 0.96 1.09 1.01 0.04 >> slub-min 0.95 1.10 1.00 0.04 >> slub-rvrt 0.90 1.08 0.99 0.05 >> slqb 0.96 1.07 1.00 0.04 >> > > Well, it doesn't make a whole pile of sense to get the average of these ratios > or the deviation between them. Each of the tests behave very differently.
Uhm, yes. I need to learn to read one of these days.
Pekka
| |