lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Bug #12263] Sata soft reset filling log
Hello.

Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

>>>>>This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>>>>of regressions introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28.

>>>>>The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>>>>introduced between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should
>>>>>be listed and let me know (either way).

>>>>>Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12263
>>>>>Subject : Sata soft reset filling log
>>>>>Submitter : Justin Madru <bevicm@dslextreme.com>
>>>>>Date : 2008-12-13 2:07 (64 days old)
>>>>>References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122913412608533&w=4

>>>>I'm still seeing this on .29-rc5, and I think that my bug #12263 is a
>>>>duplicate of bug #12609,
>>>>or more correctly it's a duplicate of mine because I reported first.

>>>>It seems like the bug has been fixed in tip/master for some time now.
>>>>Below is the diff of origin and tip from when I tested.

>>>Ingo, do you know whinch patch in -tip fixes this regression?

>>This one, done on Jan 10, more than a month ago:

>> f1d26da: Revert "libata: Add 32bit PIO support"

>>When a commit causes trouble in -tip qa i immediately revert it in 95%
>>of the cases, no questions asked. Especially if it's related to
>>persistent storage.

> OK, thanks.

> We seem to have a working fix patch for this issue in bug #12609.

Wait, if this is indeed post-2.6.27 regression, it couldn't possibly have
been caused by that patch which got merged during 2.6.29-rc1 timeframe.
Something's up with this bug...

MBR, Sergei


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-18 12:23    [W:0.154 / U:0.464 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site