Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:59:16 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: #tj-percpu has been rebased |
| |
Rusty Russell wrote: > On Thursday 12 February 2009 14:14:08 Tejun Heo wrote: >> Oops, those are the same ones. I'll give a shot at cooking up >> something which can be dynamically sized before going forward with >> this one. > > That's why I handed it to you! :) > > Just remember we waited over 5 years for this to happen: the point of these > is that Christoph showed it's still useful. > > (And I really like the idea of allocing congruent areas rather than remapping > if someone can show that it's semi-reliable. Good luck!)
Well, it's easy to do in virtual space. Trying to do it in physical space seems nearly impossible.
-hpa
| |