Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: get/put unaligned helpers | From | Harvey Harrison <> | Date | Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:07:02 -0800 |
| |
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:35 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I just loked into using the new get/put unaligned helpers. I must > say that I'm really unhappy about the lack of typing there. We did > put all the sparse infrastructure in place to make sure we do have > strong typechecking for LE/Be types, but using these helpers defeats > that. > > Can you please make these properly typed?
Christoph, here's a quick summary of comments on the unaligned access bits I've previously submitted, please let me know if you have any additional ones.
Proposed API:
u16 load_le16_noalign(const __le16 *p) u32 load_le32_noalign(const __le32 *p) u64 load_le64_noalign(const __le64 *p) u16 load_be16_noalign(const __be16 *p) u32 load_be32_noalign(const __be32 *p) u64 load_be64_noalign(const __be64 *p)
void store_le16_noalign(__le16 *p, u16 val) void store_le32_noalign(__le32 *p, u32 val) void store_le64_noalign(__le64 *p, u64 val) void store_be16_noalign(__be16 *p, u16 val) void store_be32_noalign(__be32 *p, u32 val) void store_be64_noalign(__be64 *p, u64 val)
I'd also like to offer aligned versions like load_le16() store_le16() to make it symmetric. Then for arches that have no alignment constraints the unaligned helpers would degrade to the aligned helpers. load_le16() already exists as le16_to_cpup, but store_le16 would be a new API.
Now, from discussions with the SCSI-folks, they really aren't interested in a typesafe interface as most of the time they are reading/writing into a u8 buffer at some offset. It seems a lot of the other places currently in-kernel also do the same. So I'm tempted to keep offering a version wrapped around the typesafe versions that takes a u8 *.
As they were not interested in doing the following:
load_be16_noalign((__be16 *)&buf[offset]);
Perhaps a wrapper could be provided:
load_be16_offset(u8 *buf, int offset)
Thoughts?
Harvey
| |