Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:17:39 -0800 | From | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <> | Subject | Re: #tj-percpu has been rebased |
| |
Rusty Russell wrote: > That's why I handed it to you! :) > > Just remember we waited over 5 years for this to happen: the point of these > is that Christoph showed it's still useful. > > (And I really like the idea of allocing congruent areas rather than remapping > if someone can show that it's semi-reliable. Good luck!)
I really don't like the idea of making percpu memory (physically) move around. It would break Xen's usage of it for a start... Virtual remapping would be OK.
J
| |