Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: #tj-percpu has been rebased | Date | Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:28:54 +1030 |
| |
On Thursday 12 February 2009 14:14:08 Tejun Heo wrote: > Oops, those are the same ones. I'll give a shot at cooking up > something which can be dynamically sized before going forward with > this one.
That's why I handed it to you! :)
Just remember we waited over 5 years for this to happen: the point of these is that Christoph showed it's still useful.
(And I really like the idea of allocing congruent areas rather than remapping if someone can show that it's semi-reliable. Good luck!)
Thanks! Rusty.
| |