lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: git-send-email
    [H. Peter Anvin - Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:13:16AM -0800]
    | Junio C Hamano wrote:
    | >
    | > I personally prefer the former, but as you hopefully all found out by now,
    | > the choice between these two is just the matter of personal taste, and
    | > there is no clear majority.
    | >
    |
    | Quite on the contrary. I think there is a clear majority in favor of
    | --no-chain-reply-to. Let me add my voice to that chorus, too.
    |
    | -hpa
    |
    | --
    | H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
    | I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
    |

    If that somehow matter -- I'm _for_ --no-chain-reply-to
    by default too. It happens several times with me that
    I missed this option even having in mind --no-chain-reply-to
    behaviour expected.

    On the other hand I think --no-chain-reply-to has much
    sense if pathes being sent are not numbered in title.
    But on LKML I can't remember even one mail-thread which was
    not numbered :)

    - Cyrill -


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-02-13 20:03    [W:6.011 / U:0.332 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site