Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:59:16 +0300 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: git-send-email |
| |
[H. Peter Anvin - Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 10:13:16AM -0800] | Junio C Hamano wrote: | > | > I personally prefer the former, but as you hopefully all found out by now, | > the choice between these two is just the matter of personal taste, and | > there is no clear majority. | > | | Quite on the contrary. I think there is a clear majority in favor of | --no-chain-reply-to. Let me add my voice to that chorus, too. | | -hpa | | -- | H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center | I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf. |
If that somehow matter -- I'm _for_ --no-chain-reply-to by default too. It happens several times with me that I missed this option even having in mind --no-chain-reply-to behaviour expected.
On the other hand I think --no-chain-reply-to has much sense if pathes being sent are not numbered in title. But on LKML I can't remember even one mail-thread which was not numbered :)
- Cyrill -
| |