[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] x86: Pass in pt_regs pointer for syscalls that need it
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
>>> I checked the disassembly of these functions and didn't see this
>>> happen on gcc 4.3.0.
>> Well, tracking down why run_init_process() is returning 0 with
>> -fstack-protector wasn't much of fun. These breakages are very subtle
>> and if we're gonna pass in pointer to pt_regs anyway and thus can
>> guarantee such breakage can't happen at no additional cost, I think we
>> should do that even if it means slightly more argument fetching in a
>> few places.
> In addition, if we do that, we can remove the horrible
> asmlinkage_protect() thing altogether.

Like I said before, the tail-call optimization problem isn't limited
to just this set of syscalls. There are only two real ways to fix it.
1) Set up a real stack frame for the syscalls instead of overalying
pt_regs, or 2) patch gcc to tell it not to touch the args area of the

Brian Gerst

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-11 16:01    [W:0.059 / U:2.908 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site