lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for February 10 (security/audit/ima)
Hi Randy,

On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:55:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > Dropped trees (temporarily):
> > audit (difficult conflicts)
>
> Maybe this is fixed by the dropped audit tree?

The audit tree is Al Viro's (cc'd). But I *think* everything in it has
been applied upstream.

> linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:111: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_match'
> linux-next-20090210/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:230: error: implicit declaration of function 'security_audit_rule_init'
>
> when
> CONFIG_SECURITY=y
> CONFIG_AUDIT=n
> CONFIG_IMA=y
> CONFIG_IMA_AUDIT=y

This looks more like a security subsystem than audit to me?

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-02-10 23:43    [W:0.120 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site