[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kmemcheck: make bitfield annotations truly no-ops when disabled
Andrew Morton kirjoitti:
> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 18:42:13 +0100
> Vegard Nossum <> wrote:
>> It turns out that even zero-sized struct members (int foo[0];) will affect
>> the struct layout, causing us in particular to lose 4 bytes in struct sock.
>> This patch fixes the regression in CONFIG_KMEMCHECK=n case.
> Which kernel version is the regression relative to?

AFAICT, it dates back to 2.6.31 when kmemcheck was introduced in
mainline. Vegard?

> Should we backport this into 2.6.32.x?

I guess so. Eric, how bad is the regression?


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-09 14:33    [W:0.065 / U:122.512 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site