lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Async resume patch (was: Re: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33)


On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> You mean, if A comes before B in the list and A must suspend after B?

But if they are not topologically ordered, then A wouldn't necessarily be
before B on the list in the first place.

Of course, if we've mucked with the list by hand and made sure the
ordering is ok, then that's a different issue. But your whole point seemed
to be that the device could impose its own ordering in its suspend
callback, which is not true on its own without external ordering.

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-09 03:57    [W:0.266 / U:0.052 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site