[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] PM updates for 2.6.33
On Tue, 8 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> However, the parent can be on a different bus type than the children, so it
> looks like we can only start the asynchronous path at the core level.


> > Unless you want to do _all_ of the async logic in generic code and
> > re-introduce the "dev->async_suspend" flag.
> Quite frankly, I would like to.
> > I would be ok with that now that the infrastructure seems so simple.
> Well, perhaps I should dig out my original async suspend/resume patches
> that didn't contain all of the non-essential stuff and post them here for
> discussion, after all ...

That seems like a very good idea. IIRC they were quite similar to what
we have been discussing.

Alan Stern

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-08 04:31    [W:0.143 / U:1.444 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site