[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch 02/23] locking: Split rwlock from spinlock headers
    On Sunday 06 December 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
    > +
    > +#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_H
    > +# error "please don't include this file directly"
    > +#endif
    > +

    Hmm, why not? I think it would be nice to have rwlock.h self-contained
    to the degree that users of rwlock_t but not spinlock_t only need to
    include the rwlock header and vice versa.

    Obviously, we'd have to clean up all the ~200 users of rwlock_t before
    we're able to remove rwlock.h from spinlock.h, but the other direction
    could be done easily.

    Arnd <><

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-07 18:31    [W:0.023 / U:2.996 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site