[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data_loc?
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:34:43PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
> VERY very sorry for my long silence...
> Please don't commit this patch, Ingo.
> This patch is required to test the next patch for perf lock.
> I have a question for Steven Rostedt and Tom Zanussi.
> Does current raw_field_ptr() support __data_loc?
> At 064739bc4b3d7f424b2f25547e6611bcf0132415 ,
> support for the modifier "__data_loc" of format is added.

I guess this patch handled the nature of the strings, but the current
end use is in perl. There is no support of it in raw_field_ptr().

Your patch looks good to me..

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-07 05:05    [W:0.109 / U:53.892 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site