[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] Does raw_field_ptr() supports __data_loc?
    On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 12:34:43PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
    > VERY very sorry for my long silence...
    > Please don't commit this patch, Ingo.
    > This patch is required to test the next patch for perf lock.
    > I have a question for Steven Rostedt and Tom Zanussi.
    > Does current raw_field_ptr() support __data_loc?
    > At 064739bc4b3d7f424b2f25547e6611bcf0132415 ,
    > support for the modifier "__data_loc" of format is added.

    I guess this patch handled the nature of the strings, but the current
    end use is in perl. There is no support of it in raw_field_ptr().

    Your patch looks good to me..

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-12-07 05:05    [W:0.019 / U:1.240 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site