lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[107/119] ath5k: Linear PCDAC code fixes
2.6.31-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
From: Nick Kossifidis <mick@madwifi-project.org>

commit d1cb0bdac180a4afdd3c001acb2618d2a62d9abe upstream.

* Set correct xpd curve indices for high/low gain curves during
rfbuffer setup on RF5112B with both calibration curves available.

* Don't return zero min power when we have the same pcdac value
twice because it breaks interpolation. Instead return the right
x barrier as we do when we have equal power levels for 2 different
pcdac values.

Signed-off-by: Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath5k/phy.c
@@ -740,13 +740,22 @@ int ath5k_hw_rfregs_init(struct ath5k_hw
AR5K_RF_XPD_GAIN, true);

} else {
- /* TODO: Set high and low gain bits */
- ath5k_hw_rfb_op(ah, rf_regs,
- ee->ee_x_gain[ee_mode],
+ u8 *pdg_curve_to_idx = ee->ee_pdc_to_idx[ee_mode];
+ if (ee->ee_pd_gains[ee_mode] > 1) {
+ ath5k_hw_rfb_op(ah, rf_regs,
+ pdg_curve_to_idx[0],
AR5K_RF_PD_GAIN_LO, true);
- ath5k_hw_rfb_op(ah, rf_regs,
- ee->ee_x_gain[ee_mode],
+ ath5k_hw_rfb_op(ah, rf_regs,
+ pdg_curve_to_idx[1],
AR5K_RF_PD_GAIN_HI, true);
+ } else {
+ ath5k_hw_rfb_op(ah, rf_regs,
+ pdg_curve_to_idx[0],
+ AR5K_RF_PD_GAIN_LO, true);
+ ath5k_hw_rfb_op(ah, rf_regs,
+ pdg_curve_to_idx[0],
+ AR5K_RF_PD_GAIN_HI, true);
+ }

/* Lower synth voltage on Rev 2 */
ath5k_hw_rfb_op(ah, rf_regs, 2,
@@ -1897,8 +1906,9 @@ ath5k_get_linear_pcdac_min(const u8 *ste
s16 min_pwrL, min_pwrR;
s16 pwr_i;

- if (WARN_ON(stepL[0] == stepL[1] || stepR[0] == stepR[1]))
- return 0;
+ /* Some vendors write the same pcdac value twice !!! */
+ if (stepL[0] == stepL[1] || stepR[0] == stepR[1])
+ return max(pwrL[0], pwrR[0]);

if (pwrL[0] == pwrL[1])
min_pwrL = pwrL[0];



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-07 01:25    [W:0.255 / U:4.020 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site