lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BUG] 2.6.32 - Sddr-09 SM reader resets endlessly
On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Ed Tomlinson wrote:

> On Saturday 05 December 2009 16:34:26 Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Andries E. Brouwer wrote:
> >
> > > > Andries, do you have any idea what's going on? Evidently this device
> > > > doesn't accept the protocol used by the sddr09 driver.
> > >
> > > Hi Alan,
> > >
> > > Sorry, no - I have no memory and worked on these USB drivers
> > > years ago. Forgot all details. Also my last sddr09 device broke
> > > some time ago.
> > >
> > > Looking at my old files I do not see the Vendor Id 0781, so maybe
> > > this is a device I never encountered.
> > > These old files also discuss some trickery with multi-lun devices
> > > where the driver needed depends on the lun. This is not a reader
> > > of multiple types of card?
> > >
> > > Many of my SM readers worked with either sddr09 or sddr55.
> > > Does the unusual devices section today say that such a device
> > > needs sddr09?
> > >
> > > Found a 2.6.31 source tree. Yes,
> > >
> > > UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0781, 0x0200, 0x0000, 0x9999,
> > > "Sandisk",
> > > "ImageMate SDDR-09",
> > > US_SC_SCSI, US_PR_EUSB_SDDR09, usb_stor_sddr09_init,
> > > 0),
> > >
> > > Is it known who added this? Is 0208 in the interval of known devices
> > > for which sddr09 works?
> >
> > The entry was added before 2.5.0 (more than 7 years ago), and I can't
> > tell who added it. And the entry doesn't say anything about DPCM
> > (multiple-LUN trickery).
> >
> > Ed, it looks like you're out of luck. Unless you can figure out the
> > vendor-specific protocol used by that device, and modify the sddr09
> > driver to support it, you won't be able to use the device under Linux.
> >
> > Or am I completely off base? Did it used to work with an earlier
> > kernel? If it did, can you get a usbmon trace of it?
>
> This is a regression. The device works fine in 2.6.31 something
> in .32 breaks it.

Okay, that's new information. Can you post a usbmon trace from 2.6.31?

Alan Stern



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-12-06 05:53    [W:0.160 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site